Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews · Hepato-Biliary

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

There was no evidence of differences in the proportion of participants experiencing serious adverse events (for any of the comparisons Quality of evidence = very low1,2,3. · people undergoing liver resection

1 finding from 1 review

Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta‐analysis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Intervention not reported

There was no evidence of differences in the number of serious adverse events for any of the comparisons Quality of evidence = very low1,2,3. · people undergoing liver resection

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta‐analysis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found