Cochrane · systematic review · CD010683
Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta‐analysis
Moggia, E, Rouse, B, Simillis, C, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
3
current version
GRADE rated
1
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 66.7%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: people undergoing liver resection
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
There was no evidence of differences in the proportion of participants experiencing serious adverse events (for any of the comparisons Quality of evidence = very low1,2,3. | no estimate extracted | NR | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
There was no evidence of differences in the number of serious adverse events for any of the comparisons Quality of evidence = very low1,2,3. | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
None of the trials reported this outcome at any time point. | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |