Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

139 questions · 139 findings · 12 reviews · Consumers and Communication

No studies found 20 · 14.4%GRADE not reported 17 · 12.2%Very low 43 · 30.9%Low 30 · 21.6%Moderate 21 · 15.1%High 8 · 5.8%

Intervention not reported

Behavioural outcome: immunisation rate ATCS Plus, IVR, unidirectional versus no calls, letters, usual care at median · participants at risk of under‐immunisation (children, adolescents and adults)

The intervention probably leads to higher behavioural outcome: immunisation rate ATCS Plus, IVR,… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening Multimodal/complex intervention versus usual care at 12 months · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis

The intervention leads to higher behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening Multimodal/complex… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening IVR versus enhanced usual care at median · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis

The intervention showed no clear difference in behavioural outcome: breast cancer screening IVR versus enhanced… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening Multimodal/complex intervention versus usual care at median · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis

The intervention leads to higher behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening Multimodal/complex… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR versus usual care at 6‐month · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis

The intervention probably leads to higher behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR versus usual… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR, unidirectional ATCS versus usual care or letter at longer (9‐12 months) · participants at risk for breast, colorectal or cervical cancer; or osteoporosis

The intervention showed no clear difference in behavioural outcome: colorectal cancer screening IVR, unidirectional… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Behavioural outcome: immunisation rate Unidirectional ATCS versus usual care at median · participants at risk of under‐immunisation (children, adolescents and adults)

The intervention probably leads to higher behavioural outcome: immunisation rate Unidirectional ATCS versus… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Behavioural outcome: adherence to medication or composite outcome (medication adherence and rate of adverse events) ATCS Plus versus usual care · patients with various conditions or at risk of low adherence to medication or laboratory tests
1 finding from 1 review