Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 28.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 5 · 71.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Visual acuity · participants (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 107 participants
Low

Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Mean uncorrected near visual acuity (LogMAR) (1 year) · participants (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 107 participants
Low

Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Mean uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (LogMAR) (1 year) · participants (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 107 participants
Low

Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Mean logMAR visual acuity at 1‐year · participants (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 107 participants
Low

Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Mean contrast sensitivity (1 year) · participants (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Mean quality of life or visual function (measured using Visual Function Index‐14 tool) (1 year) · participants (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Adverse events (1 year) · participants (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 129 participants
Low