Vision‐related patient‐reported outcome measurement at 6 months (the greater the score, the better) · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical measures, such as reading speed or reading acuity at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Compliance · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Technical difficulties · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes technical difficulties with the intervention at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Device abandonment rate at 6 months · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes device abandonment rate at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Primary rehabilitation · Chronic respiratory disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health‐related quality of life (Change in CRQ Dyspnoea) CRQ · Chronic respiratory disease
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in quality of life ‐ CRQ dyspnoea domain compared with no rehabilitation control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Exercise capacity · Chronic respiratory disease
Telerehabilitation may leads to higher exercise capacity ‐ 6MWD (m) compared with no rehabilitation control (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Dyspnea · Chronic respiratory disease
It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes dyspnoea ‐ mMRC compared with no rehabilitation control (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Quality of life ‐ CAT · Chronic respiratory disease
It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes quality of life ‐ CAT compared with no rehabilitation control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Exercise capacity · Chronic respiratory disease
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in exercise capacity ‐6MWD (m) compared with centre‐based (outpatient) pulmonary rehabilitation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dyspnea · Chronic respiratory disease
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in breathlessness ‐ CRQ dyspnoea domain compared with centre‐based (outpatient) pulmonary rehabilitation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
SGRQ Total SGRQ (Total) Score. Scale from: 0 to 100. Lower score indicates better quality of life. · Chronic respiratory disease
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in quality of life ‐ SGRQ compared with centre‐based (outpatient) pulmonary rehabilitation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life ‐ CAT · Chronic respiratory disease
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in quality of life ‐ CAT compared with centre‐based (outpatient) pulmonary rehabilitation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Primary rehabilitation · Chronic respiratory disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
HRQoL: CRQ total score · Chronic respiratory disease
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in quality of life ‐ CRQ total score compared with no rehabilitation control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Finding 15. Healthcare providers differed in their views about whether telerehabilitation was cost‐efficient for them, but many patients encountered it as affordable and cost‐saving when the equipment and infrastructure have been provided.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Finding 5. Patients and healthcare providers described several factors that might affect patients’ motivation and engagement with telerehabilitation services, including support from healthcare providers or family members and other caregivers durin...
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Finding 7. Patients regarded in‐person home‐based rehabilitation and telerehabilitation services as convenient and less disruptive of everyday activities.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Finding 10. Patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders described how telerehabilitation changed the nature of the patient‐provider relationship. This included overcoming physical barriers to communication and enabling quick ...
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found