evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

75 questions · 84 findings · 3 reviews · Esthetic dentistry

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 10 · 11.9%GRADE not reported 21 · 25%Very low 50 · 59.5%Low 3 · 3.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

A permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique

Outcome not reported · Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of anterior teeth, irrespective of…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

A permanent restorative material or technique (e.g. amalgam; glass ionomer (type I-IV); composite resin (macrofilled, microfilled, hybrid, nanofilled); resin-modified glass ionomer (compomer, giomer); cement/cermet; stainless steel or nickel-chrome crown; pre-fabricated resin/porcelain veneer facing; microabrasion) vs A different permanent restorative material or technique

Outcome not reported · Children and adolescents under 18 years with amelogenesis imperfecta requiring restorative care of posterior teeth, irrespective of…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer

Colour match (aesthetic achievement) · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

6% HP strip vs 10% CP gel in tray

Tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

It is very uncertain whether 6% HP strip changes tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist compared with 10% CP gel in tray (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

5.3% HP strip vs 5% HP gel in tray

Patient comfort / acceptability · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

It is very uncertain whether 5.3% HP strip changes patient comfort / acceptability compared with 5% HP gel in tray (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

10% CP gel in tray vs placebo

Tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

It is very uncertain whether 10% CP gel in tray changes tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist compared with placebo (very low certainty).

4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

5.6% SHMP chewing gum vs placebo

Tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

It is very uncertain whether 5.6% SHMP chewing gum changes tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

6% HP paint-on gel + KF vs 6% HP paint-on gel

Tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

It is very uncertain whether 6% HP paint-on gel + KF changes tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist compared with 6% HP paint-on gel (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

18% CP paint-on gel vs placebo

Tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

It is very uncertain whether 18% CP paint-on gel changes tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

6% HP gel in tray vs placebo

Tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

It is very uncertain whether 6% HP gel in tray changes tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

CP gel in tray vs placebo

Adverse effects · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)
1 finding from 1 review

6% HP strip vs 10% CP gel in tray

Tooth whitening - reported by the patient · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

6% HP strip showed no clear difference in tooth whitening - reported by the patient compared with 10% CP gel in tray; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

5.9% HP strip vs 5.9% HP paint-on gel

Tooth whitening - reported by the patient · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

It is very uncertain whether 5.9% HP strip changes tooth whitening - reported by the patient compared with 5.9% HP paint-on gel (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

14% HP strip vs 9.5% HP gel in tray

Tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist · Adults (>=18 years) undergoing home-based bleaching (including tetracycline- and smoking-stained teeth, any baseline shade)

It is very uncertain whether 14% HP strip changes tooth whitening - assessed by the dentist compared with 9.5% HP gel in tray (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review