Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
Suprapubic catheterisation showed no clear difference in number of participants with symptomatic UTI compared with intermittent urethral catheterisation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Asymptomatic bacteruria · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of patients with pain · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
1 finding from 1 review
Ease of use for participants ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cost utility analysis ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
It is very uncertain whether indwelling urethral catheterisation changes number of participants with symptomatic UTI compared with suprapubic catheterisation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Asymptomatic bacteruria · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
It is very uncertain whether indwelling urethral catheterisation changes asymptomatic bacteruria compared with suprapubic catheterisation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants with pain · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
Indwelling urethral catheterisation may leads to higher number of participants with pain compared with suprapubic catheterisation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ease of use for participants ‐ not reported · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life ‐ not reported · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cost utility analysis ‐ not reported · Adults with short‐term catheterisation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Ease of use for participants ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cost utility analysis ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
1 finding from 1 review
Asymptomatic bacteruria · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
It is very uncertain whether indwelling urethral catheterisation changes asymptomatic bacteruria compared with intermittent urethral catheterisation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of patients with pain ‐ not reported · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found