Question · asked by 1 review
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs suprapubic catheterisation: Quality of life ‐ not reported
- Population
- Adults with short‐term catheterisation
- Intervention
- Indwelling urethral catheterisation
- Comparison
- suprapubic catheterisation
- Outcome
- Quality of life ‐ not reported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs suprapubic catheterisation Quality of life ‐ not reported · Adults with short‐term catheterisation The review found no eligible studies for this question. Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.