Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

18 questions · 19 findings · 4 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 10 · 52.6%Low 8 · 42.1%Moderate 1 · 5.3%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Supervision vs no supervision to improve the quality of primary health care · Providers practice
  Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 134 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Supervision vs no supervision to improve the quality of primary health care · Providers knowledge
  Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 134 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- 'Enhanced' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care · Children receiving recommended or adequate care (Rowe 2009)
  Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 1 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- 'Enhanced' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care · Clients satisfaction (Sennun 2006) Questionnaire. Scale from: 0 to 90.
  Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 390 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- Interventions for vs no intervention · Number of deaths due to SUDEP: nocturnal supervision compared to no supervision
  Treatments for the prevention of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  203 participants
  Very low

Supervision vs no supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Providers practice · providers

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 134 participants
Low

Supervision vs no supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Providers knowledge · providers

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 134 participants
Very low

Supervision vs no supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Drug supply · providers

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 1 participants
Very low

Interventions for vs no intervention

Number of deaths due to SUDEP: Nocturnal supervision compared to no supervision · cases of SUDEP and matched controls (number of deaths due to SUDEP) and consecutive people with epilepsy from a tertiary care teaching…

2 findings from 1 review

Treatments for the prevention of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
203 participants
Very low
Treatments for the prevention of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.76 [0.4, 1.46]
48 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Completed preventive therapy with Isoniazid ‐ LHW supported self‐supervision or DOT compared with self‐supervision · patients with tuberculosis (TB) treatment

The intervention showed no clear difference in completed preventive therapy with Isoniazid ‐ LHW supported… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious… 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.92, 1.09]
2 studies · 595 participants
Moderate

'Less intense' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

New clients gained by community‐based posts (number per quarter) Daily log completed by the supervisor reporting activities of providers · providers and users

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 247 participants
Low

'Less intense' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Average number of revisits per quarter (health‐facility‐based posts) Daily log completed by the supervisor reporting activities of providers · providers and users

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 247 participants
Low

'Less intense' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Average number of revisits per quarter (community‐based posts) Daily log completed by the supervisor reporting activities of providers · providers and users

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 247 participants
Low

'Enhanced' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Functional status of community health agents (Ayele 1993) · providers and users

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 102 participants
Very low

'Enhanced' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Overall performance score midwives (Loevinsohn 1995) Scale from: 0 to 60. · providers and users

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 112 participants
Very low

'Enhanced' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Children receiving recommended or adequate care (Rowe 2009) · providers and users

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 1 participants
Very low

'Enhanced' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Health worker job satisfaction (Sennun 2006) Questionnaire. Scale from: 0 to 165. · providers and users

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 6 participants
Very low

'Enhanced' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

Clients satisfaction (Sennun 2006) Questionnaire. Scale from: 0 to 90. · providers and users

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 390 participants
Very low

'Less intense' vs routine supervision to improve the quality of primary health care

New clients gained by health facility based posts (number per quarter) Daily log completed by the supervisor reporting activities of providers · providers and users

1 finding from 1 review

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 247 participants
Low

Summary of findings ‐ computerised learning vs traditional learning

Patient outcomes · licensed health professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals fully licensed to practice without supervision)

1 finding from 1 review

E‐learning for health professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 168 participants
Low

Summary of findings ‐ computerised learning vs traditional learning

Health professionals' behaviours · licensed health professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals fully licensed to practice without supervision)

1 finding from 1 review

E‐learning for health professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 950 participants
Low

Summary of findings ‐ computerised learning vs traditional learning

Health professionals' skills · licensed health professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals fully licensed to practice without supervision)

1 finding from 1 review

E‐learning for health professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 2912 participants
Very low

Summary of findings ‐ computerised learning vs traditional learning

Health professional knowledge at 90 d · licensed health professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals fully licensed to practice without supervision)

1 finding from 1 review

E‐learning for health professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 3236 participants
Low