Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings ‐ computerised learning vs traditional learning: Health professionals' behaviours
- Population
- licensed health professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals fully licensed to practice without supervision)
- Intervention
- Summary of findings ‐ computerised learning
- Comparison
- traditional learning
- Outcome
- Health professionals' behaviours
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: e‐learning vs traditional learning Health professionals' behaviours · licensed health professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals fully licensed to practice without… E‐learning for health professionals (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 950 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| E‐learning for health professionals 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.