evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

13 questions · 13 findings · 1 reviews · Back and Neck

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 23.1%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 30.8%Moderate 6 · 46.2%High 0 · 0%

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs no intervention

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 10 worst pain ( compared with NO INTERVENTION (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs no intervention

Function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( compared with NO INTERVENTION (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs no intervention

Global Perceived Effect · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in global Perceived Effect: VAS 0 to 100 ( compared with NO INTERVENTION (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization + Manual Therapy vs manual therapy

Pain intensity VAS (0 to 100; 0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain) · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: 6 weeks treatment VAS 0 no pain to 10 worst pain ( compared with manual Therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization + Manual Therapy vs manual therapy

Function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( compared with manual Therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization + Manual Therapy vs manual therapy

Global Perceived Effect · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in global Perceived Effect: VAS 0 to 100 ( compared with manual Therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM + Trunk/Extremity Strengthening + Trunk/Extremity Endurance Training + Pattern/Synchronization: Coordination + Cardiovascular/Aerobic + Cognitive (CBT) + ANOTHER TREATMENT vs THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with subacute/chronic WAD

Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM +… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 10 worst pain ( compared with THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM + Trunk/Extremity Strengthening + Trunk/Extremity Endurance Training + Pattern/Synchronization: Coordination + Cardiovascular/Aerobic + Cognitive (CBT) + ANOTHER TREATMENT vs THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT

Function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( · patients with subacute/chronic WAD

Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM +… showed no clear difference in function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( compared with THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM + Trunk/Extremity Strengthening + Trunk/Extremity Endurance Training + Pattern/Synchronization: Coordination + Cardiovascular/Aerobic + Cognitive (CBT) + ANOTHER TREATMENT vs THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT

Global Perceived Effect · patients with subacute/chronic WAD

Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM +… showed no clear difference in global perceived effect: ‐5 to 5 scale; vastly worse to completely… compared with THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM + Trunk/Extremity Strengthening + Trunk/Extremity Endurance Training + Pattern/Synchronization: Coordination + Cardiovascular/Aerobic + Cognitive (CBT) + ANOTHER TREATMENT vs THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT

QoL · patients with subacute/chronic WAD

Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM +… showed no clear difference in quality of Life: SF‐36 0 high disability to 100 no disability ( compared with THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review