Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM + Trunk/Extremity Strengthening + Trunk/Extremity Endurance Training + Pattern/Synchronization: Coordination + Cardiovascular/Aerobic + Cognitive (CBT) + ANOTHER TREATMENT vs THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT: Function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability (
Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM +… showed no clear difference in function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( compared with THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM + Trunk/Extremity Strengthening + Trunk/Extremity Endurance Training + Pattern/Synchronization: Coordination + Cardiovascular/Aerobic + Cognitive (CBT) + ANOTHER TREATMENT vs THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT Function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( · patients with subacute/chronic WAD Subacute to Chronic WAD: Trunk/Extremity Stretch/ROM +… showed no clear difference in function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( compared with THAT SAME OTHER TREATMENT (low certainty). Exercises for mechanical neck disorders (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 132 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exercises for mechanical neck disorders 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.