tDCS plus speech and language therapy (SLT) versus sham tDCS plus SLT for improving aphasia: dropouts Dropouts and adverse events · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Language impairment: accuracy of naming nouns at · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
2 findings from 1 review
Language impairment: accuracy of naming verbs post intervention Accuracy in verb naming. Scale from: −infinity to +infinity · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Functional communication · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
2 findings from 1 review
Expressive language: naming · adults with aphasia following stroke
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: SLT changes expressive language: naming compared with social support and stimulation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Expressive language: naming · adults with aphasia following stroke
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: SLT changes expressive language: naming (6 months compared with no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Receptive language: auditory comprehension · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT showed no clear difference in receptive language: auditory comprehension compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Reading comprehension · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT probably leads to higher receptive language: reading comprehension compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Expressive language: naming · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT showed no clear difference in expressive language: naming compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Expressive language: general · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT may leads to higher expressive language: general compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Expressive language: written · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT probably leads to higher expressive language: written compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Receptive language: auditory comprehension · adults with aphasia following stroke
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: SLT changes receptive language: auditory comprehension (6 months compared with no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Functional communication · adults with aphasia following stroke
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Dropout · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT may leads to lower number of dropouts for any reason compared with social support and stimulation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Functional communication · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT probably leads to higher functional communication compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dropout · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT showed no clear difference in number of dropouts (for any reason) compared with no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Functional communication · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT A may leads to higher functional communication compared with SLT B (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severity of impairment · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT A probably leads to higher severity of impairment compared with SLT B (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dropout · adults with aphasia following stroke
Summary of findings: SLT showed no clear difference in number of dropouts (for any reason) compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Functional communication · adults with aphasia following stroke
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: SLT changes functional communication (6 months compared with no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review