Number of runners sustaining a lower‐limb running injurya ( · healthy adults participating in recreational running
Soft may leads to lower number of runners sustaining a lower‐limb running injurya ( compared with hard running shoes (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of lower‐limb running injuries · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of runners who failed to return to running or their previous level of running · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Runner satisfaction with footwear · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events (e.g. skin complaints) other than musculoskeletal injuries · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of runners requiring hospital admission or surgery, or both, for musculoskeletal injury or adverse event · healthy adults participating in recreational running
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Live birth rate · women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination
Soft catheters showed no clear difference in live birth rate compared with firm catheters (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pregnancy rate · women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination
It is very uncertain whether soft catheters changes pregnancy rate compared with firm catheters (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Instrumental assistance needed · women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination
1 finding from 1 review
Blood on catheter tip · women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination
1 finding from 1 review
Cramping · women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination
1 finding from 1 review
Miscarriage · women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination
It is very uncertain whether soft catheters changes miscarriage per woman compared with firm catheters (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Failed delivery with allocated instrument (primary) · Women in the second stage of labour, requiring an assisted vaginal birth
Soft cup may leads to higher failed delivery with allocated instrument (primary) compared with rigid cup (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Any maternal trauma (primary) · Women in the second stage of labour, requiring an assisted vaginal birth
Soft cup showed no clear difference in any maternal trauma (primary) compared with rigid cup (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Any neonatal injury (primary) · Women in the second stage of labour, requiring an assisted vaginal birth
1 finding from 1 review
Third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal tear (with or without episiotomy) · Women in the second stage of labour, requiring an assisted vaginal birth
Soft cup showed no clear difference in third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal tear (with or without episiotomy) compared with rigid cup (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Postpartum haemorrhage · Women in the second stage of labour, requiring an assisted vaginal birth
Soft cup showed no clear difference in postpartum haemorrhage (≥ 500 mL or as defined by trial authors) compared with rigid cup (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Low Apgar score · Women in the second stage of labour, requiring an assisted vaginal birth
Soft cup showed no clear difference in low Apgar score at 5 minutes (less than 7 or as defined by trial… compared with rigid cup (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Low umbilical artery pH (< 7.2 or as defined by trial authors) · Women in the second stage of labour, requiring an assisted vaginal birth
Soft cup showed no clear difference in low umbilical artery pH (< 7.2 or as defined by trial authors) compared with rigid cup (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Miscarriage · couples undergoing ART
It is very uncertain whether TLS utilising embryo selection software changes miscarriage compared with conventional incubation and assessment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review