Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 14.3%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 3 · 42.9%High 0 · 0%

Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training

Performance of obstetric team in practice (Kirkpatrick level 3: behavioural change)

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐professional simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 2398 participants
Moderate

Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training

Maternal and perinatal outcome (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome)

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐professional simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 79320 participants
Low

Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training

Maternal death

It is very uncertain whether simulation‐based obstetric team training changes maternal mortality (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) compared with no training (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐professional simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.82 [0.3, 2.27]
2 studies · 79246 participants
Very low

Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training

Neonatal mortality

Simulation‐based obstetric team training showed no clear difference in neonatal mortality (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) compared with no training (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐professional simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.7 [0.48, 1.01]
2 studies · 79246 participants
Low

Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training

Low Apgar score

Simulation‐based obstetric team training showed no clear difference in low Apgar score (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) compared with no training (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐professional simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.99 [0.85, 1.15]
2 studies · 115171 participants
Low

Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training

Trauma due to shoulder dystocia (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome)

Simulation‐based obstetric team training showed no clear difference in trauma due to shoulder dystocia (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) compared with no training (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐professional simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.5 [0.25, 1]
1 study · 28657 participants
Moderate

Simulation‐based obstetric team training vs no training

Cesarean delivery (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome)

Simulation‐based obstetric team training probably leads to lower cesarean delivery (Kirkpatrick level 4: patient outcome) compared with no training (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐professional simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.79 [0.67, 0.93]
1 study · 50589 participants
Moderate