Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

12 questions · 12 findings · 5 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 25%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 25%Low 5 · 41.7%Moderate 1 · 8.3%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Returning vs discarding the aspirated/drained gastric residual volume · Length of hospital stay (days) (at the end of
  Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
Direct match · question page
- Returning vs discarding the aspirated/drained gastric residual volume · Pneumonia (at the end of
  Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
Direct match · question page
- Combined interventions vs usual care · Proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up to 6 months)
  Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.56 [1.23, 1.98]
  4 studies · 395 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Transfer from incubator to cot at lower vs higher body weight · Proportion of infants having at least one episode of returning to incubator
  Transfer of preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.78 [0.77, 4.08]
  3 studies · 336 participants
  Moderate
Direct match · question page
- Returning vs discarding the aspirated/drained gastric residual volume · Mortality (at the end of
  Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Returning vs discarding gastric residuals

Mortality (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Returning vs discarding gastric residuals

Pneumonia · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Returning vs discarding gastric residuals

Length of hospital stay · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

NSAIDs vs opioid

Return to function on day 7 or later (numbers returning to full function or returning to training) · acute soft tissue injury

NSAID may leads to higher return to function on day 7 or later (numbers returning to full… compared with opioid (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs versus other oral analgesic agents for acute soft tissue injury 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.13 [1.03, 1.25]
2 studies · 749 participants
Low

Psychological interventions (including health education) vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up to 6 months) · patients with coronary heart disease

It is very uncertain whether psychological interventions (including health education) changes proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.08 [0.84, 1.4]
6 studies · 375 participants
Very low

Combined interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up to 6 months) · patients with coronary heart disease

Combined interventions may leads to higher proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.56 [1.23, 1.98]
4 studies · 395 participants
Low

Combined interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6 months ‐ 1 year) · patients with coronary heart disease

Combined interventions showed no clear difference in proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [1, 1.13]
10 studies · 992 participants
Low

Psychological interventions (including health education) vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6 months ‐ 1 year) · patients with coronary heart disease

It is very uncertain whether psychological interventions (including health education) changes proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.24 [0.95, 1.63]
7 studies · 316 participants
Very low

Physical conditioning interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up to 6 months) · patients with coronary heart disease

It is very uncertain whether physical conditioning interventions changes proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.17 [0.97, 1.41]
4 studies · 460 participants
Very low

Physical conditioning interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6 months ‐ 1 year) · patients with coronary heart disease

Physical conditioning interventions showed no clear difference in proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.09 [0.99, 1.2]
5 studies · 510 participants
Low

Circuit class therapy vs other interventions

Balance and mobility Timed up and go test. Standing up, walking, returning to sit down in seconds · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 488 participants
Low

Transfer from incubator to cot at lower vs higher body weight

Proportion of infants having at least one episode of returning to incubator · patients with preterm infants

Transfer from incubator to cot at lower showed no clear difference in proportion of infants having at least one episode of returning to… compared with higher body weight (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transfer of preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.78 [0.77, 4.08]
3 studies · 336 participants
Moderate