evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

6 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 2 · 28.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 57.1%Moderate 1 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Overall mortality · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation showed no clear difference in overall mortality compared with conventional ventilation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Mortality before cross‐over · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation probably leads to lower mortality before cross‐over compared with conventional ventilation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Chronic lung disease · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation showed no clear difference in chronic lung disease at 28 days of birth (CLD 28 days) compared with conventional ventilation (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Pulmonary air leak (new) · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation showed no clear difference in pulmonary air leak (new) compared with conventional ventilation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation vs conventional ventilation

Severe intraventricular haemorrhage · preterm infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction

Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation showed no clear difference in severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grades 3 and 4) compared with conventional ventilation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review