Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Heart

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 6 · 85.7%High 0 · 0%

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

Composite endpoint (including all‐cause mortality, non‐fatal myocardial infarction and/or any new stroke assessed at 30 days after surgery) · people undergoing CABG (with or without valve surgery)

RIPC showed no clear difference in composite endpoint (including all‐cause mortality, non‐fatal… compared with no RIPC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass grafting (with or without valve surgery) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.99 [0.78, 1.25]
2 studies · 2463 participants
Moderate

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) · people undergoing CABG (with or without valve surgery)

RIPC showed no clear difference in cardiac troponin T (cTnT) compared with no RIPC (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass grafting (with or without valve surgery) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 1792 participants
Low

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

cTnT 72 h after surgery (ng/L) · people undergoing CABG (with or without valve surgery)

RIPC showed no clear difference in cTnT 72 h after surgery (ng/L) compared with no RIPC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass grafting (with or without valve surgery) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 1120 participants
Moderate

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

cTnT AUC 72 h (ng/L) · people undergoing CABG (with or without valve surgery)

RIPC showed no clear difference in cTnT AUC 72 h (ng/L) compared with no RIPC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass grafting (with or without valve surgery) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 830 participants
Moderate

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) · people undergoing CABG (with or without valve surgery)

RIPC showed no clear difference in cardiac troponin I (cTnI) compared with no RIPC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass grafting (with or without valve surgery) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 745 participants
Moderate

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

cTnI 72 h after surgery (ng/L) · people undergoing CABG (with or without valve surgery)

RIPC showed no clear difference in cTnI 72 h after surgery (ng/L) compared with no RIPC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass grafting (with or without valve surgery) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 459 participants
Moderate

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) vs no RIPC

cTnI AUC 72 h (ng/L) · people undergoing CABG (with or without valve surgery)

RIPC showed no clear difference in cTnI AUC 72 h (ng/L) compared with no RIPC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for coronary artery bypass grafting (with or without valve surgery) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 159 participants
Moderate