Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 20%Low 4 · 80%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Protease‐modulating matrix dressing regimen vs any other dressing regimen

Proportion of participants with healed ulcers at 6 weeks · people with venous leg ulcers

It is very uncertain whether protease‐modulating matrix dressing regimen changes proportion of participants healed ‐ short term (4‐8 weeks) compared with any other dressing regimen (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Protease‐modulating matrix dressing regimen vs any other dressing regimen

Proportion of participants with healed ulcers at 12 weeks · people with venous leg ulcers

Protease‐modulating matrix dressing regimen showed no clear difference in proportion of participants healed ‐ medium term (12 weeks) compared with any other dressing regimen (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Protease‐modulating matrix dressing regimen vs any other dressing regimen

Proportion of participants healed ‐ long term (over 24 weeks) · people with venous leg ulcers

Protease‐modulating matrix dressing regimen showed no clear difference in proportion of participants healed ‐ long term (over 24 weeks) compared with any other dressing regimen (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Protease‐modulating matrix dressing regimen vs any other dressing regimen

Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events at 2‐12 weeks · people with venous leg ulcers

Protease‐modulating matrix dressing regimen showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events at 2‐12 weeks compared with any other dressing regimen (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review