Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)
Mixed/regular word reading accuracy · English‐speaking poor readers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted11 studies · 701 participantsLow
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 57.1%Moderate 3 · 42.9%High 0 · 0%
Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)
Non‐word reading accuracy · English‐speaking poor readers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted10 studies · 682 participantsLow
Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)
Irregular word reading accuracy · English‐speaking poor readers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted4 studies · 294 participantsModerate
Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)
Mixed/regular word reading fluency · English‐speaking poor readers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted4 studies · 224 participantsModerate
Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)
Non‐word reading fluency · English‐speaking poor readers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 188 participantsModerate
Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)
Reading comprehension · English‐speaking poor readers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted5 studies · 343 participantsLow
Phonics training vs control (no training or alternative training)
Spelling · English‐speaking poor readers
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 158 participantsLow