Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

26 questions · 26 findings · 2 reviews

No studies found 2 · 7.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 7 · 26.9%Low 11 · 42.3%Moderate 3 · 11.5%High 3 · 11.5%

Pazopanib vs lapatinib

Specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether pazopanib changes specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae compared with lapatinib (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Progression‐free survival · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Pazopanib showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib vs sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Pazopanib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib vs placebo (targeted agent versus placebo)

Progression‐free survival · Previous treated and treatment‐naïve (54%) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Pazopanib leads to lower progression‐free survival (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with placebo (targeted agent versus placebo) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib vs placebo (targeted agent versus placebo)

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Previous treated and treatment‐naïve (54%) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Pazopanib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with placebo (targeted agent versus placebo) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib plus lapatinib vs lapatinib

Specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether pazopanib plus lapatinib changes specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae compared with lapatinib (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib plus lapatinib vs lapatinib

Specific adverse events: haemorrhage · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether pazopanib plus lapatinib changes specific adverse events: haemorrhage compared with lapatinib (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib plus lapatinib vs lapatinib

Adverse events: thromboembolic events · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether pazopanib plus lapatinib changes specific adverse events: thromboembolic events compared with lapatinib (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review