Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 28.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 71.4%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

One‐incision vs two‐incision techniques

Subjective function (short term) · adults undergoing arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction1

1 finding from 1 review

One‐incision versus two‐incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 79 participants
Very low

One‐incision vs two‐incision techniques

Subjective function (intermediate term) · adults undergoing arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction1

1 finding from 1 review

One‐incision versus two‐incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 79 participants
Very low

One‐incision vs two‐incision techniques

Subjective function (long term) · adults undergoing arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction1

It is very uncertain whether one‐incision changes subjective function (long term) compared with two‐incision techniques (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

One‐incision versus two‐incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.04 [0.91, 1.18]
1 study · 85 participants
Very low

One‐incision vs two‐incision techniques

Quality of life ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) EQ‐5Di; SF‐36c,m; WHOQOL‐BREFe,j,n (higher score = better quality of life) · adults undergoing arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction1

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

One‐incision versus two‐incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

One‐incision vs two‐incision techniques

Adverse events (overall) · adults undergoing arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction1

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

One‐incision versus two‐incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

One‐incision vs two‐incision techniques

Activity level: Tegner score ( 0 to 10; higher scores = greater activity) · adults undergoing arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction1

1 finding from 1 review

One‐incision versus two‐incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 59 participants
Very low

One‐incision vs two‐incision techniques

IKDC knee examination grade normal (grade A) or nearly normal (grade B) ‐ Intermediate/long‐term · adults undergoing arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction1

It is very uncertain whether one‐incision changes objective functional knee assessments using IKDC10 (intermediate… compared with two‐incision techniques (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

One‐incision versus two‐incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.01 [0.85, 1.21]
4 studies · 167 participants
Very low