Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

38 questions · 38 findings · 6 reviews · Consumers and Communication

No studies found 4 · 10.5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 9 · 23.7%Low 18 · 47.4%Moderate 7 · 18.4%High 0 · 0%

Culturally adapted health literacy skills building course vs no/unrelated health literacy intervention

Health behaviour – Time point a: short‐term (up to 1 month post‐intervention) Multiple outcomes assessed and multiple measures used: (1) Fat‐related dietary habits Fat‐Related Diet Habits Questionnaire (score · migrants
1 finding from 1 review

Culturally and literacy adapted self‐management programme vs no health literacy intervention

Health behaviour 5– Time point a: short‐term (immediately post‐intervention) Multiple outcomes assessed and multiple measures used: (1) Blood glucose self‐monitoring 24‐hour recall, 3 questions on blood glucose self‐monitoring behaviour (2) Adhere... · migrants
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Patient harms associated with patient and family involvement in escalation of care (5a) Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist total score for state anxiety (range 0‐21). Higher scores signify higher anxiety; a score of ≥ 11 indicates clinically sign... · Adults (and/or family members) with potential for acute life‐threatening illness
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Global quality of life FLIC total score (Blanchard 1996), FACT‐G total score (Northouse 2007). Additional studies (reported in comments section): FACT‐B physical functioning subscale (Baucom 2009). EPIC multiple subscales and overall scores (Campb... · individuals with cancer (patients)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Global quality of life score Multiple measures used. WHO‐Five‐Wellbeing Index (Ledderer 2013) FACT‐G total score (Northouse 2007). Additional study (reported in comments section): SF20 subscales (Blanchard 1996). Higher scores indicate better QoL · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Any depression Multiple measures used. CES‐D (Blanchard 1996; Kozachik 2001; Kuijer 2004; Kurtz 2005; McCorkle 2007). POMS Depression subscale (Bultz 2000; Campbell 2007). HADS‐D (Nicolaisen 2018; Robertson 2016). Additional study (reported in com... · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Any depression Multiple measures used. CES‐D (Blanchard 1996;McCorkle 2007). POMS Depression subscale (Bultz 2000). HADS‐D (Nicolaisen 2018; Robertson 2016). Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. Folllow‐up: Three to six months post‐... · informal caregivers of people affected by cancer
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Prejudice Multiple scales4 · General public or any of its constituent groups (excluding groups comprising solely of people with mental ill health)

The intervention may leads to higher prejudice Multiple scales4 (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review