Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 3 · 100%High 0 · 0%

Microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy vs conventional trabeculotomy

Mean IOP ( · children at or before five years of age with primary congenital glaucoma

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for primary congenital glaucoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 99 participants
Moderate

Microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy vs conventional trabeculotomy

Proportion of participants with IOP≤ 21 mmHg, with or without ocular hypotensive medications 1 year · children at or before five years of age with primary congenital glaucoma

Microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy probably leads to higher proportion with postoperative IOP ≤ 21 mmHg (surgical success) with… compared with conventional trabeculotomy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for primary congenital glaucoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.54 [1.2, 1.97]
2 studies · 99 participants
Moderate

Microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy vs conventional trabeculotomy

Hyphema · children at or before five years of age with primary congenital glaucoma

Microcatheter‐assisted trabeculotomy probably leads to higher adverse outcomes— hyphema Up to 1 year after surgery compared with conventional trabeculotomy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for primary congenital glaucoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.25 [1.25, 4.04]
2 studies · 102 participants
Moderate