Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

8 questions · 8 findings · 2 reviews · Gut

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 37.5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 62.5%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs metoclopramide plus nasogastric tube lavage

UGIH‐related mortality · people with acute UGIH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs metoclopramide plus nasogastric tube lavage

SAEs · people with acute UGIH

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs metoclopramide plus nasogastric tube lavage

All‐cause mortality · people with acute UGIH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs metoclopramide plus nasogastric tube lavage

Visualisation of gastric mucosa · people with acute UGIH

It is very uncertain whether erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage changes visualisation of gastric mucosa compared with metoclopramide plus nasogastric tube lavage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.3 [0.86, 1.96]
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs metoclopramide plus nasogastric tube lavage

NSAEs · people with acute UGIH

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs metoclopramide plus nasogastric tube lavage

Rebleeding · people with acute UGIH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Erythromycin plus nasogastric tube lavage vs metoclopramide plus nasogastric tube lavage

Blood transfusion · people with acute UGIH

1 finding from 1 review

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Failure rate of post‐pyloric placement of the enteral feeding tube assessed by abdominal radiograph Radiographic assessment of successful tube placement · patients needing post‐pyloric placement of naso‐enteral feeding tubes

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes failure rate of post‐pyloric placement of the enteral feeding tube… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Metoclopramide for post‐pyloric placement of naso‐enteral feeding tubes 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.82 [0.61, 1.1]
4 studies · 204 participants
Very low