Menstruation recovery or maintenance: · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
GnRH agonist plus chemotherapy may leads to higher menstruation recovery or maintenance: compared with chemotherapy alone (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Premature ovarian failure · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
GnRH agonist plus chemotherapy probably leads to lower premature ovarian failure compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pregnancy · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
GnRH agonist plus chemotherapy showed no clear difference in pregnancy compared with chemotherapy alone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ovulation · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
GnRH agonist plus chemotherapy may leads to higher ovulation compared with chemotherapy alone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects: hot flush · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
It is very uncertain whether gnRH agonist plus chemotherapy changes adverse effects: hot flush compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects: vaginal dryness · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
GnRH agonist plus chemotherapy showed no clear difference in adverse effects: vaginal dryness compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Premature ovarian failure · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Pregnancy · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
It is very uncertain whether gnRH agonist‐antagonist cotreatment plus chemotherapy changes pregnancy compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ovulation · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Adverse events · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Menstruation recovery or maintenance: · premenopausal women with malignant conditions, receiving GnRH agonist before or in parallel to chemotherapy
It is very uncertain whether gnRH agonist‐antagonist cotreatment plus chemotherapy changes menstruation recovery or maintenance: compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Overall survival ( · people with HGG
Anti‐angiogenic therapy showed no clear difference in overall survival ( compared with no anti‐angiogenic therapy (high certainty).
4 findings from 1 review
HR 0.95 [0.88, 1.02]
11 studies · 3743 participants
High
HR 0.93 [0.86, 1.02]
8 studies · 2833 participants
High
HR 0.99 [0.85, 1.16]
3 studies · 910 participants
Moderate
Show 1 more finding
Progression‐free survival · people with HGG
Anti‐angiogenic therapy leads to lower progression‐free survival ( compared with no anti‐angiogenic therapy (high certainty).
4 findings from 1 review
HR 0.73 [0.68, 0.79]
10 studies · 3595 participants
High
HR 0.75 [0.69, 0.82]
8 studies · 2833 participants
High
HR 0.64 [0.54, 0.76]
2 studies · 762 participants
Moderate
Show 1 more finding
All cause mortality · people with cancer who have febrile neutropenia
beta‐lactam monotherapy showed no clear difference in all cause mortality compared with beta‐lactam‐aminoglycoside combination therapy (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Any nephrotoxicity ‐ Ag dosing regimen (Copy) · people with cancer who have febrile neutropenia
beta‐lactam monotherapy leads to lower any nephrotoxicity ‐ Ag dosing regimen (Copy) compared with beta‐lactam‐aminoglycoside combination therapy (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical failure—same beta lactam Antibiotic modifications · people with cancer who have febrile neutropenia
beta‐lactam monotherapy probably leads to higher treatment failure ‐ same beta‐lactam compared with beta‐lactam‐aminoglycoside combination therapy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Treatment failure ‐ different beta‐lactam · people with cancer who have febrile neutropenia
beta‐lactam monotherapy may leads to lower treatment failure ‐ different beta‐lactam compared with beta‐lactam‐aminoglycoside combination therapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Progression‐free survival · patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
Maintenance chemotherapy showed no clear difference in 3‐year PFS compared with maintenance radiotherapy (low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
RR 1.07 [0.75, 1.54]
1 study · 141 participants
Low
RR 0.86 [0.55, 1.37]
1 study · 141 participants
Low
RR 0.89 [0.51, 1.55]
1 study · 141 participants
Low
3‐year OS · patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
Maintenance chemotherapy showed no clear difference in 3‐year OS compared with maintenance radiotherapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
5‐year OS · patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
Maintenance chemotherapy showed no clear difference in 5‐year OS compared with maintenance radiotherapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review