Local haemorrhage · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease
Local anaesthesia showed no clear difference in local haemorrhage compared with general anaesthesia (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Any stroke within 30 days of operation (primary outcome) · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease
1 finding from 1 review
Death within 30 days of operation · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease
Local anaesthesia showed no clear difference in death within 30 days of operation compared with general anaesthesia (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Perioperative ipsilateral stroke (< 30 days) · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease
Local anaesthesia showed no clear difference in ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of operation compared with general anaesthesia (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Perioperative death and strokes · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease
Local anaesthesia showed no clear difference in stroke or death within 30 days of operation compared with general anaesthesia (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Myocardial infarction (0 to 30 days) · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease
Local anaesthesia showed no clear difference in myocardial infarction within 30 days of operation compared with general anaesthesia (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Arteries shunted · patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease
Local anaesthesia may leads to lower arteries shunted compared with general anaesthesia (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia (soft tissue, self-reported; 100% success in all studies) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
1 finding from 1 review
'100% success' (lidocaine 1:100,000 vs 3% mepivacaine plain): infraorbital block - Berberich 2009 40/40 vs 40/40; IANB - Cohen 1993 27/27 vs 34/34, McLean 1993 30/30 vs 30/30. Both 100% successful.
3 studies · 121 participants
GRADE not reported
Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
4% prilocaine plain showed no clear difference in success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia, absence of pain (clinical testing of diseased pulps with irreversible pulpitis) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine may leads to higher success of local anaesthesia, absence of pain (clinical testing of… compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
It is very uncertain whether 4% articaine plain changes success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia (soft tissue, self-reported; 100% success in all studies) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
1 finding from 1 review
'Other comparisons with 100% success': IANB - Allegretti 2016 22/22 vs 22/22; Visconti 2016 21/21 vs 21/21. Both formulations 100% successful; no meta-analysis (no difference).
2 studies · 43 participants
GRADE not reported
Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
It is very uncertain whether 2% lidocaine, 1:50,000 epinephrine changes success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia (soft tissue, self-reported; 100% success in all studies) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
It is very uncertain whether 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine changes success of local anaesthesia (soft tissue, self-reported) compared with 2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
It is very uncertain whether 4% articaine plain changes success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia (soft tissue, self-reported; 100% success in all studies) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
1 finding from 1 review
'100% success' (lidocaine 1:100,000 vs 1:50,000): infraorbital block - Berberich 2009 40/40 vs 40/40; mandibular BI - Dagher 1997 30/30, Yonchak 2001 40/40; IANB - Yared 1997 30/30, Wali 2010 30/30. Both 100% successful.
5 studies · 170 participants
GRADE not reported
Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
3% mepivacaine plain showed no clear difference in success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:50,000 epinephrine (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia (soft tissue, self-reported; 100% success in all studies) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine showed no clear difference in success of local anaesthesia (soft tissue, self-reported) compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
It is very uncertain whether 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine changes success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 4% prilocaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Success of local anaesthesia, absence of pain (clinical testing of healthy pulps, hard and soft tissues) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…
0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine showed no clear difference in success of local anaesthesia, absence of pain (clinical testing of… compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review