Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

12 questions · 13 findings · 2 reviews

No studies found 1 · 7.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 23.1%Moderate 8 · 61.5%High 1 · 7.7%

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

All‐cause mortality · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control showed no clear difference in mortality compared with standard glycaemic control (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 2 reviews · compare the 2 reviews

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality compared with conventional glycaemic control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

Non‐fatal MI · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control probably leads to lower non‐fatal myocardial infarction compared with conventional glycaemic control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

End‐stage renal disease · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control showed no clear difference in end‐stage renal disease compared with conventional glycaemic control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

Global cognitive function (defined as reduction of at least 3 points in MMSE) · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control showed no clear difference in global cognitive function (defined as reduction of at least 3 points… compared with standard glycaemic control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

Incidence of dementia · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control showed no clear difference in incidence of dementia (defined as dementia according to DSM‐IV) compared with standard glycaemic control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review