Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

26 questions · 28 findings · 4 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 7.1%Very low 9 · 32.1%Low 5 · 17.9%Moderate 5 · 17.9%High 7 · 25%

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Consistent female condom use by FSWs at 24‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower consistent female condom use by FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom showed no clear difference in HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Chlamydia incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower chlamydia incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Use of birth control methods (consistent condom use) · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower consistent male condom use at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Sexually Transmitted Diseases · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years

The intervention showed no clear difference in sexually Transmitted Diseases (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Initiation of sexual intercourse (mixed gender) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 9 years

The intervention showed no clear difference in initiation of sexual intercourse (mixed gender) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Use of birth control methods (condom use in last sex) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 9 years

The intervention showed no clear difference in use of birth control methods (condom use in last sex) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Sexually Transmitted Diseases · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 9 years

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes sexually Transmitted Diseases (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Use of birth control methods (condom use in last sex) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years

The intervention showed no clear difference in use of birth control methods (condom use in last sex) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Sexually Transmitted Diseases · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years

The intervention showed no clear difference in sexually Transmitted Diseases (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Use of birth control methods (condom use at last sex) · Male and female adolescents aged 10 years to 19 years

The intervention probably leads to higher use of birth control methods (condom use at last sex) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review