evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 60%Moderate 2 · 40%High 0 · 0%

Electromagnetic‐guided vs endoscopic‐guided postpyloric placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes

Technical success in insertion

Electromagnetic‐guided showed no clear difference in technical success in insertion compared with endoscopic‐guided postpyloric placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Electromagnetic‐guided vs endoscopic‐guided postpyloric placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes

Aspiration pneumonitis

Electromagnetic‐guided showed no clear difference in aspiration pneumonitis compared with endoscopic‐guided postpyloric placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Electromagnetic‐guided vs endoscopic‐guided postpyloric placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes

Adverse events

Electromagnetic‐guided showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with endoscopic‐guided postpyloric placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review