Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Gut · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 7 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match
- · Colonic transit rate (geometric centre of radioactive substance). Unit indicates position along with intestinal tract. Scale from: 1 (small intestine) to 5 (rectosigmoid area).
  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low
Direct match
- · Number of participants with improved complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) of greater than three times per week at two‐month
  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.07 [0.74, 1.53]
  1 study · 42 participants
  Very low
Direct match
- · Number of participants with improved colonic transit
  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 5 [0.79, 31.63]
  1 study · 21 participants
  Very low
Direct match
- · Parent‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life)
  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 33 participants
  Very low
Related
- · Self‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using Peds QL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life)
  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 33 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

Number of participants with improved complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) of greater than three times per week at two‐month · children with chronic constipation

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes number of participants with improved complete spontaneous bowel… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.07 [0.74, 1.53]
1 study · 42 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Number of participants with improved colonic transit · children with chronic constipation

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes number of participants with improved colonic transit (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 5 [0.79, 31.63]
1 study · 21 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Colonic transit rate (geometric centre of radioactive substance). Unit indicates position along with intestinal tract. Scale from: 1 (small intestine) to 5 (rectosigmoid area). · children with chronic constipation

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Number of participants with improved symptoms related to soiling · children with chronic constipation

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes number of participants with improved symptoms related to soiling (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.08 [0.86, 5]
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Number of participants with improved quality of life · children with chronic constipation

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes number of participants with improved quality of life (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 4 [0.56, 28.4]
1 study · 16 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Self‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using Peds QL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life) · children with chronic constipation

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 33 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Parent‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life) · children with chronic constipation

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 33 participants
Very low