Empirical antifungal treatment · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract showed no clear difference in empirical antifungal treatment compared with antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Toxicity (adverse events probably due to drug) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract showed no clear difference in toxicity (adverse events probably due to drug) compared with antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Toxicity (adverse events probably due to drug) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
1 finding from 1 review
Empirical antifungal treatment · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs partially absorbed from GI tract (miconazole,… showed no clear difference in empirical antifungal treatment compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Empirical antifungal treatment · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole,… led to lower empirical antifungal treatment compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Toxicity (adverse events probably due to drug) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract (fluconazole, ketoconazole,… showed no clear difference in toxicity (adverse events probably due to drug) compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Physiological parameters (cardiac/respiratory events; type and volume of GA drug) · Children and young people aged 17 years or younger having dental treatment (including extractions) under general anaesthesia (secondary…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Physiological parameters (cardiac/respiratory events; type and volume of GA drug) · Children and young people aged 17 years or younger having dental treatment (including extractions) under general anaesthesia (secondary…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Physiological parameters (cardiac/respiratory events; type and volume of GA drug) · Children and young people aged 17 years or younger having dental treatment (including extractions) under general anaesthesia (secondary…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Physiological parameters (cardiac/respiratory events; type and volume of GA drug) · Children and young people aged 17 years or younger having dental treatment (including extractions) under general anaesthesia (secondary…
1 finding from 1 review
Because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity in the studies, we were unable to determine an estimate of effect
2 studies · 148 participants
Very low
Parasympathomimetic drugs (choline esters, cholinesterase inhibitors) vs No treatment
Outcome not reported · Patients with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found
Systemic fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract showed no clear difference in systemic fungal infection compared with antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Death associated with fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract showed no clear difference in death associated with fungal infection compared with antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Good compliance · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract led to higher good compliance compared with antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract led to lower oral candidiasis (present) compared with antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Mycological: eradication of oral candidiasis · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with overt oral candidiasis
Absorbed drug (fluconazole or ketoconazole) led to higher mycological: eradication of oral candidiasis compared with drug not absorbed from GI tract (amphotericin B or nystatin); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical: eradication of oral candidiasis · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with overt oral candidiasis
Absorbed drug (fluconazole or ketoconazole) led to higher clinical: eradication of oral candidiasis compared with drug not absorbed from GI tract (amphotericin B or nystatin); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Oral candidiasis (present) · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract showed no clear difference in oral candidiasis (present) compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Death associated with fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract showed no clear difference in death associated with fungal infection compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Systemic fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
Antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract showed no clear difference in systemic fungal infection compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review