evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 4 · 57.1%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 2 · 28.6%High 1 · 14.3%

Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation

Survival to hospital discharge · Patients with non‐trauma related out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

Continuous chest compression alone leads to higher survival to hospital discharge compared with interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation

Survival to hospital admission · Patients with non‐trauma related out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

Continuous chest compression alone showed no clear difference in survival to hospital admission compared with interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous chest compression alone vs interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation

Neurological function at hospital discharge, measured by cerebral performance category (CPC) · Patients with non‐trauma related out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

Continuous chest compression alone showed no clear difference in neurological outcomes at hospital discharge Measured as 'good' or… compared with interrupted chest compression plus artificial ventilation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review