Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

27 questions · 27 findings · 5 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 11.1%Very low 0 · 0%Low 5 · 18.5%Moderate 7 · 25.9%High 12 · 44.4%

Carboplatin vs cisplatin chemotherapy

Overall survival (baseline risks for low‐ and high‐risk groups in the control arm were estimated at 1 year) · combination with third‐generation drugs for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Carboplatin showed no clear difference in overall survival (baseline risks for low‐ and high‐risk groups in… compared with cisplatin chemotherapy (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carboplatin vs cisplatin chemotherapy

Adverse events: neurotoxicity (grade 3/4) ( · combination with third‐generation drugs for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Carboplatin probably leads to higher grade III or IV neurotoxicity compared with cisplatin chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carboplatin vs cisplatin chemotherapy

Safety (AE, adverse drug reaction): thrombocytopenia Grades 3 or 4 according to National Cancer Institute · combination with third‐generation drugs for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Carboplatin probably leads to higher grade III or IV thrombocytopenia compared with cisplatin chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Carboplatin vs cisplatin chemotherapy

Grade III or IV renal toxicity · combination with third‐generation drugs for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Carboplatin showed no clear difference in grade III or IV renal toxicity compared with cisplatin chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin

Progression‐free survival · first‐line treatment of ovarian cancer

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin

Overall survival (OS) · first‐line treatment of ovarian cancer

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin showed no clear difference in overall survival (OS) compared with tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin

Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia · first‐line treatment of ovarian cancer

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin showed no clear difference in haematological adverse event: Grade 3/4 neutropenia compared with tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin

Grade 3 and 4 hematological adverse events (AE) ‐ anemia · first‐line treatment of ovarian cancer

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin leads to higher haematological adverse event: Grade 3/4 anaemia compared with tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin

Neurological adverse event: Grade 3/4 neuropathy, not otherwise specified · first‐line treatment of ovarian cancer

Weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin showed no clear difference in neurological adverse event: Grade 3/4 neuropathy, not otherwise… compared with tri‐weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gefitinib vs pemetrexed + carboplatin with pemetrexed maintenance

Overall survival · EGFR M+ patients with NSCLC

Gefitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with pemetrexed + carboplatin with pemetrexed maintenance (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gefitinib vs pemetrexed + carboplatin with pemetrexed maintenance

Progression‐free survival · EGFR M+ patients with NSCLC

Gefitinib probably leads to lower progression‐free survival compared with pemetrexed + carboplatin with pemetrexed maintenance (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

BEV+IRI (1 RCT, 79 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…

The intervention leads to higher BEV+IRI (1 RCT, 79 participants) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

BEV+VB111 (1 RCT, 128 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…

The intervention leads to higher BEV+VB111 (1 RCT, 128 participants) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

BEV+TRC 105 (1 RCT, 49 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…

The intervention leads to higher BEV+TRC 105 (1 RCT, 49 participants) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review