Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 2 reviews · Incontinence · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 50%Moderate 2 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Visceral injury · vaginal prolapse

Transvaginal biological graft showed no clear difference in visceral injury compared with native tissue repair (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.34 [0.04, 3.26]
2 studies · 254 participants
Low

Visceral injury · vaginal prolapse

Transvaginal permanent mesh may leads to higher visceral injury compared with native tissue repair (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.67 [1.63, 8.28]
14 studies · 1997 participants
Low

Intraoperative Visceral injury · women with apical vaginal vault prolapse

Vaginal procedure showed no clear difference in intraoperative Visceral injury compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.46 [0.13, 1.63]
7 studies · 625 participants
Moderate

Bladder injury · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Absorbable showed no clear difference in visceral injury ‐ Bladder compared with non absorbable sutures (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.43 [0.11, 1.65]
3 studies · 545 participants
Moderate