What do systematic reviews say?

Biological therapy vs placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment

Biological therapy showed no clear difference in any adverse events compared with placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment (high certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.08 [1, 1.17]
  1 study · 491 participants
  High

Biological therapy vs placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 283 participants
  Low

Biological therapy vs placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment

Biological therapy leads to lower overall survival compared with placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment (high certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.55 [0.41, 0.73]
  3 studies · 781 participants
  High

Biological therapy vs placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment

Biological therapy probably leads to lower progression‐free survival compared with placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment (moderate certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.33 [0.19, 0.57]
  3 studies · 781 participants
  Moderate

Biological therapy vs placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment

Biological therapy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment (low certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.14 [0.95, 1.37]
  2 studies · 638 participants
  Low

Biological therapy vs placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment

Biological therapy may leads to higher tumour response rate compared with placebo, best supportive care (BSC) or no treatment (low certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 5.12 [1.23, 21.27]
  3 studies · 687 participants
  Low

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.93 [0.83, 1.04]
  7 studies · 2743 participants
  Moderate

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

It is very uncertain whether chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy changes progression‐free survival compared with chemotherapy (very low certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.87 [0.74, 1.02]
  7 studies · 2743 participants
  Very low

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

It is very uncertain whether chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy changes serious adverse events compared with chemotherapy (very low certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.17 [0.95, 1.44]
  4 studies · 1618 participants
  Very low

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

It is very uncertain whether chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy changes tumour response rate compared with chemotherapy (very low certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.35 [0.99, 1.85]
  6 studies · 2404 participants
  Very low

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy showed no clear difference in any adverse events compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.01 [1, 1.03]
  3 studies · 1513 participants
  Moderate

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy vs chemotherapy alone

Chemmotherapy combined with biological therapy showed no clear difference in quality of life (QoL) compared with chemotherapy (low certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.88 [0.74, 1.04]
  2 studies · 1154 participants
  Low

Chemotherapy vs biological therapy

Chemotherapy showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with biological therapy (moderate certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 0.82 [0.66, 1.02]
  1 study · 395 participants
  Moderate

Chemotherapy vs biological therapy

Chemotherapy probably leads to higher progression‐free survival compared with biological therapy (moderate certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  HR 1.27 [1.03, 1.57]
  1 study · 395 participants
  Moderate

Chemotherapy vs biological therapy

Chemotherapy may leads to lower serious adverse events compared with biological therapy (low certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.41 [0.3, 0.57]
  1 study · 570 participants
  Low

Chemotherapy vs biological therapy

Chemotherapy showed no clear difference in tumour response rate compared with biological therapy (low certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.17 [0.72, 1.88]
  1 study · 395 participants
  Low

Chemotherapy vs biological therapy

Chemotherapy probably leads to lower any adverse events compared with biological therapy (moderate certainty).

• Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.63 [0.56, 0.71]
  1 study · 570 participants
  Moderate

Antibiotics (short duration) vs prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy be used

Should short‐course antibiotic therapy showed no clear difference in recurrence of pneumonia Clinical and/or microbiological criteria compared with prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy be used (low certainty).

• Short‐course versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.41 [0.94, 2.12]
  19 studies · 733 participants
  Low

Antibiotics (short duration) vs prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy be used

Should short‐course antibiotic therapy probably leads to higher recurrence of pneumonia NF‐GNB Clinical and/or microbiological… compared with prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy be used (moderate certainty).

• Short‐course versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 2.18 [1.14, 4.16]
  2 studies · 176 participants
  Moderate

Antibiotics (short duration) vs prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy be used

Should short‐course antibiotic therapy showed no clear difference in recurrence of pneumonia MRSA Clinical and/or microbiological criteria compared with prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy be used (moderate certainty).

• Short‐course versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.56 [0.12, 19.61]
  2 studies · 49 participants
  Moderate