Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 28.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 57.1%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Bioengineered devices vs standard techniques

Muscle strength · people undergoing peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Bioengineered devices vs standard techniques

Sensory recovery at ≥ 24 months · people undergoing peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb

1 finding from 1 review

Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 28 participants
Very low

Bioengineered devices vs standard techniques

Integrated functional outcome at ≥ 24 months · people undergoing peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb

1 finding from 1 review

Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 60 participants
Low

Bioengineered devices vs standard techniques

Touch threshold · people undergoing peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb

1 finding from 1 review

Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

Bioengineered devices vs standard techniques

Impact on daily living · people undergoing peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Bioengineered devices vs standard techniques

Adverse events assessed as: adverse events (serious and non‐serious) · people undergoing peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb

It is very uncertain whether bioengineered devices changes adverse events assessed as: adverse events (serious and non‐serious) compared with standard techniques (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 7.15 [1.74, 29.42]
5 studies · 213 participants
Very low

Bioengineered devices vs standard techniques

Specific serious adverse events: further surgery (device removal or revision)i assessed as: any unplanned secondary surgery to remove device · people undergoing peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb

It is very uncertain whether bioengineered devices changes specific serious adverse events: further surgery (device removal or… compared with standard techniques (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 7.61 [1.48, 39.02]
5 studies · 256 participants
Very low