Question · asked by 1 review

Bioengineered devices vs standard techniques: Specific serious adverse events: further surgery (device removal or revision)i assessed as: any unplanned secondary surgery to remove device

It is very uncertain whether bioengineered devices changes specific serious adverse events: further surgery (device removal or… compared with standard techniques (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Bioengineered devices vs standard techniques
Specific serious adverse events: further surgery (device removal or revision)i assessed as: any unplanned secondary surgery to remove device · people undergoing peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb
It is very uncertain whether bioengineered devices changes specific serious adverse events: further surgery (device removal or… compared with standard techniques (very low certainty).
Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 7.61 [1.48, 39.02]5 studies · 256 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Bioengineered nerve conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve repair of the upper limb
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.