Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews · Emergency and Critical Care

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 66.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Time to initiation of antimicrobial therapy (Time to initiation starts at the time of admission) · people admitted to intensive care units

It is very uncertain whether automated monitoring systems changes time to initiation of antimicrobial therapy (Time to initiation… compared with standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 1200 participants
Very low

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Time to initiation of fluid resuscitation (Time to initiation starts at the time of admission) · people admitted to intensive care units

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

30‐day mortality* · people admitted to intensive care units

It is very uncertain whether automated monitoring systems changes 30‐day mortality* compared with standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Duration of ICU stay · people admitted to intensive care units

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 442 participants
Very low

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Failed detection of sepsis (as reported by studies) · people admitted to intensive care units

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 560 participants
Very low

Automated monitoring systems vs usual care

Quality of life measured at the latest available time point post‐discharge from ICU (preferred measure SF‐36 then EQ‐5D) · people admitted to intensive care units

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found