Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (3 months to 2 years) compared with absorbable mesh (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue may leads to higher recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in stress urinary incontinence (de novo) (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in dyspareunia (de novo) (1‐2 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to lower repeat surgery for prolapse, SUI or mesh exposure (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether anterior prolapse repair: native tissue changes awareness of prolapse (2 years) compared with absorbable mesh (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether anterior prolapse repair: native tissue changes repeat surgery for prolapse (stage 2 or greater) at 2 years compared with absorbable mesh (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether anterior prolapse repair: native tissue changes stress urinary incontinence (2 years) compared with absorbable mesh (very low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in repeat surgery for prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in stress urinary incontinence (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in dyspareunia (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher awareness of prolapse (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher repeat surgery for prolapse (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence (1‐2 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).
Vaginal POP surgery with armed mesh may leads to higher one type of POP surgery vs another: armed anterior mesh vs anterior… compared with anterior native tissue repair (low certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).