Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

13 questions · 18 findings · 3 reviews · Heart

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 11.1%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 5.6%Low 1 · 5.6%Moderate 10 · 55.6%High 4 · 22.2%

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Physical activity and exercise interventions vs usual care

Physical activity · people with congenital heart disease.

1 finding from 1 review

Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 328 participants
Low

Face‐to‐face interventions vs control

Physical activity · patients with promoting physical activity

Face‐to‐face interventions showed no clear difference in dichotomous outcomes: 12 months Self‐reported PA questionnaire compared with control (high certainty).

4 findings from 1 review

Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.58 [0.91, 2.75]
3 studies · 3261 participants
High
Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.19 [1.02, 1.39]
1 study · 2701 participants
High
Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 4235 participants
High

Show 1 more finding

Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 23825 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Physical activity and exercise interventions vs usual care

Outcomes Length of intervention in weeks (Median, (IQR)) · people with congenital heart disease.

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Physical activity and exercise interventions vs usual care

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CF) (mL/kg/min) · people with congenital heart disease.

1 finding from 1 review

Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
14 studies · 732 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Physical activity and exercise interventions vs usual care

Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) · people with congenital heart disease.

1 finding from 1 review

Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 163 participants
Very low

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Physical activity and exercise interventions vs usual care

Submaximal cardiorespiratory fitness · people with congenital heart disease.

1 finding from 1 review

Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 179 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Physical activity and exercise interventions vs usual care

Muscle strength · people with congenital heart disease.

1 finding from 1 review

Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Physical activity and exercise interventions vs usual care

Adverse events (12 (12, 26)) · people with congenital heart disease.

1 finding from 1 review

Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 501 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Physical activity and exercise interventions vs usual care

Hospital admissions · people with congenital heart disease.

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Face‐to‐face interventions vs control

Cardio‐respiratory fitness: 12 months Sub maximal assessment of cardio‐respiratory fitness · patients with promoting physical activity

1 finding from 1 review

Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 426 participants
Moderate

Remote and web 2.0 vs control

Physical activity · patients with promoting physical activity

Remote and web 2.0 probably leads to higher dichotomous outcomes: 12 months Self‐reported physical activity… compared with control (moderate certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.42 [1.21, 1.66]
1 study · 1089 participants
Moderate
Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1049 participants
Moderate
Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 4547 participants
Moderate

Remote and web 2.0 vs control

Physical‐activity related outcomes · patients with promoting physical activity

Remote and web 2.0 showed no clear difference in dichotomous outcomes: 24 months Self‐reported physical activity… compared with control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.27 [0.99, 1.63]
1 study · 1088 participants
Moderate

Remote and web 2.0 vs control

Cardio‐respiratory fitness: 12 months · patients with promoting physical activity

1 finding from 1 review

Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 444 participants
High