Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

821 questions · 842 findings · 96 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 275 · 32.7%GRADE not reported 88 · 10.5%Very low 197 · 23.4%Low 187 · 22.2%Moderate 86 · 10.2%High 9 · 1.1%

Topical active treatment in combination with moisturiser vs topical active treatment alone

Change in use of topical active treatment ‐ not measured · people with eczema

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Emollients and moisturisers for eczema 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment incorporating surgically assisted orthodontics (adjunctive surgical procedure: corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation or interseptal bone reduction) to increase the rate of tooth movement vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Duration of orthodontic treatment, number of visits during active treatment (scheduled and unscheduled) and duration of visits · Individuals of any age receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (braces) (people requiring orthodontic tooth movement);…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
SoF row: Illustrative comparative risks '‐' / '‐'; no relative effect; Comments: 'Not reported'. Results: 'Our prespecified primary outcome (the duration of orthodontic treatment, number of visits during active…
0 studies
No studies found

Active treatment vs observation

Adverse effects of treatment · adults or children with positive microbiological isolate of MRSA from a respiratory tract specimen

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the eradication of meticillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 45 participants
Low

Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment vs other active intervention

Number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ FES versus ExMI · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

It is very uncertain whether treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment changes number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ FES versus ExMI compared with another active treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2 [0.21, 19.23]
1 study · 24 participants
Very low

Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment vs other active intervention

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Low

Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment vs other active intervention

Adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment showed no clear difference in adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone compared with another active treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 5 [0.24, 102.3]
1 study · 140 participants
Low

Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment vs other active intervention

Economic analysis using QALY · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT pre and post‐operation versus PFMT post‐operation)

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 367 participants
Moderate

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT pre and post‐operation versus PFMT post‐operation)

Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) · All men after radical prostatectomy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT pre and post‐operation versus PFMT post‐operation)

Adverse events · All men after radical prostatectomy

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 102 participants
High

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT pre and post‐operation versus PFMT post‐operation)

Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and post‐operation versus PFMT pre and post‐operation)

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment showed no clear difference in number of incontinent men after 12 months compared with another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.4 [0.25, 7.77]
1 study · 58 participants
Low

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and post‐operation versus PFMT pre and post‐operation)

Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) · All men after radical prostatectomy

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and post‐operation versus PFMT pre and post‐operation)

Adverse events · All men after radical prostatectomy

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 68 participants
Low

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and post‐operation versus PFMT pre and post‐operation)

Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT)

Number of incontinent men after 12 months ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT)

Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) · All men after radical prostatectomy

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Very low

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT)

Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (pre‐operative PFMT + electrical stimulation versus pre‐operative PFMT)

Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Topical active treatment in combination with moisturiser vs topical active treatment alone

Change from baseline in disease severity according to participants ‐ not measured · people with eczema

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Emollients and moisturisers for eczema 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found