evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews · Oral Health

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 50%Moderate 3 · 50%High 0 · 0%

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing vs Sealants plus fluoride varnish (with or without restorations)

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing was probably less effective than Sealant + 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.79; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing vs Fluoride varnish

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing may not differ from 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.15; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing vs Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing was probably less effective than Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.85; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing vs Sealant

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing may not differ from Sealant for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.14; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing vs 1.23% APF gel

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing may not differ from 1.23% APF gel for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.22; low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing vs no treatment

Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)

0.2% NaF mouthrinse + supervised toothbrushing was probably more effective than no treatment for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.46; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review