Intervention not reported
Improvement in heart rate · adults with schizophrenia or related disorders treated for clozapine‐induced tachycardia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Duration of hospitalisation · adults with schizophrenia or related disorders treated for clozapine‐induced tachycardia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Clinically important adverse events · adults with schizophrenia or related disorders treated for clozapine‐induced tachycardia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Patient satisfaction · adults with schizophrenia or related disorders treated for clozapine‐induced tachycardia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life or patient satisfaction · Adolescents/teenagers undergoing orthodontic treatment
Experimental chewing adjuncts (bite wafers or chewing gum) led to lower quality of life or patient satisfaction compared with no chewing gum, placebo, or control (no adjunct); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects of pain treatment · Adolescents and adults undergoing orthodontic treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Dose/intensity and frequency of pain relief needed (analgesic/rescue medication use) · Adolescents/teenagers undergoing orthodontic treatment
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in overall seizure frequency) · people with epilepsy and intellectual disability
The intervention may leads to higher responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in overall seizure frequency) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in rate of drop seizures) · people with epilepsy and intellectual disability
The intervention showed no clear difference in responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in rate of drop seizures) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events 4 studies reported the frequency of self reported adverse events in the AED and placebo groups The results show a trend in favour of the placebo groups · people with epilepsy and intellectual disability
The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse events 4 studies reported the frequency of self reported… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Although a higher percentage of people in the ATL and aCCT groups fell within Class I (seizure free) and Class II (> 50% reduction in seizures), no significant differences in seizure frequency were noted between the groups at 2 years after surgery... · people with temporal lobe epilepsy and intellectual disabilities
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ Video 'fairytale' vs. no audiovisual aid (Passive) ICC = 0 (perfect vs. poor‐moderate compliance) · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ Video 'fairytale' vs. no audiovisual… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ 2 parents vs. 1 parent Poor compliance: ICC > 6 · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ 2 parents vs. 1 parent Poor… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anxiety during induction ‐ Parental presence vs. midazolam mYPAS. Scale from: 1 to 100. · children
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ Parental presence vs. midazolam Poor compliance: ICC > 6 · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ Parental presence vs. midazolam Poor… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ Low sensory stimulation vs. control (Passive) ICC = 0 · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ Low sensory stimulation vs. control… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ Mask introduction/exposure (Mask) ICC (number of children compliant) · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes co‐operation during induction ‐ Mask introduction/exposure (Mask)… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anxiety during induction ‐ Video game vs. midazolam (Interactive) mYPAS. Scale from: 1 to 100. · children
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Co‐operation during induction ‐ clowns/clown doctors vs. parental presence (Interactive) SAM ‐ arousal. Scale from: 1 to 5. · children
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anxiety during induction ‐ hypnosis vs. midazolam (Interactive) mYPAS < 24 · children
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes anxiety during induction ‐ hypnosis vs. midazolam (Interactive)… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review