Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,447 questions · 2,590 findings · 266 reviews

No studies found 699 · 27%GRADE not reported 289 · 11.2%Very low 614 · 23.7%Low 605 · 23.4%Moderate 322 · 12.4%High 61 · 2.4%

Three infusions of natalizumab (300 mg) and two infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) vs placebo and two infusions of infliximab

Withdrawals due to adverse outcomes · Participants with active Crohn's disease despite current treatment with infliximab

Three infusions of natalizumab (300 mg) and two infusions of… showed no clear difference in withdrawal due to adverse events up to week 10 compared with placebo and two infusions of infliximab (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Three infusions of natalizumab (300 mg) and two infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) vs placebo and two infusions of infliximab

Serious adverse events up to week 10 · Participants with active Crohn's disease despite current treatment with infliximab

Three infusions of natalizumab (300 mg) and two infusions of… showed no clear difference in serious adverse events up to week 10 compared with placebo and two infusions of infliximab (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Two infusions of natalizumab (300 mg or 3 mg/kg) vs placebo

Failure to induce remission at 6 weeks · Patients with active Crohn's disease

Two infusions of natalizumab (300 mg or 3 mg/kg) leads to lower failure to induce remission at 6 weeks compared with placebo (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Major bleeding · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in major bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Minor bleeding · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in minor bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

All‐cause mortality · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Recurrent venous thromboembolism · patients with active cancer with venous thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in recurrent venous thromboembolism compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Probiotics vs other active intervention

Grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea · participants with cancer treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy)

Probiotics may leads to lower severity of diarrhoea: grade 3 or higher compared with other active treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Probiotics vs other active intervention

Requiring rescue medication for diarrhoea · participants with cancer treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy)

It is very uncertain whether probiotics changes requiring rescue medication for diarrhoea compared with other active treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review