Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

581 questions in 23 reviews · Implants and prosthodontics

current versions
No studies 87 · 15%Ungraded 388 · 66.8%Very low 88 · 15.1%Low 10 · 1.7%Moderate 8 · 1.4%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Zirconia abutment vs Titanium abutment
Abutment/crown fracture and marginal bone level (3 years) · Patients with single-tooth implant crowns; split-mouth, 3-year · 3 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
No fractures of any abutments or crowns; non-significant differences in mean marginal bone levels, which ranged from 1.6 to 2.1 mm (narrative)1 study · 22 participantsUngraded
Fixed dental prosthesis (cantilever FDP) vs Removable dental prosthesis (RDP)
Patient satisfaction with prosthesis · Patients with a shortened dental arch (missing posterior teeth)
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.22 [0.99, 1.51]1 study · 54 participantsUngraded
Er:YAG laser vs Air-abrasive device (Perio-Flow)
Radiographic marginal bone level change · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 6 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane
After 6 months no statistically significant difference for peri-implant marginal bone levels.1 study · 42 participantsUngraded
Flapless implant placement vs Conventional flap elevation
Implant failure · Patients receiving dental implants
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.70 [0.32, 8.94]2 studies · 96 participantsUngraded
Zirconia framework FDP vs Metal framework FDP
Survival / framework fracture (3 years) · Patients receiving FDPs; parallel group, 3-year · 3 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
100% survival and no framework fractures in either group after 3 years; no significant differences between groups with respect to porcelain fractures and mean survival time (narrative)1 studyUngraded
Crestal incision vs Vestibular incision
Biological complications · Patients receiving dental implants
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants (2012) · Cochrane
Biological complications: Odds Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI), Subtotals only (no pooled estimate reported); 1 study (Heydenrijk 2000); 4 crestal vs 1 vestibular had hyperplastic tissue over the healing abutment1 studyUngraded
Technique to increase peri-implant keratinised/attached mucosa vs No increase of keratinised/attached mucosa
Outcome NR · Patients receiving dental implants
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants (2012) · Cochrane
No trial: whether the peri-implant keratinised/attached mucosa has to be increased (objective 3a) - no trial identified0 studiesNo studies
Alternative alloy FDP (e.g., Ceramalloy II / base-metal / palladium-silver) vs High-gold content control alloy FDP (Olympia)
Laboratory cost per unit · Patients receiving crowns and FDPs; split-mouth, 10-year · 10 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
Gold costs significantly higher: USD 89 per unit for gold compared to USD 53 for palladium-silver alloy and USD 37 for base-metal alloy1 studyUngraded
Tooth/implant FDP with rigid connectors vs Tooth/implant FDP with non-rigid connectors
Non-scheduled maintenance visits · Patients with tooth/implant-supported FDPs; split-mouth · 5 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
70 non-scheduled maintenance visits to treat problems with rigid connectors compared to 110 visits for non-rigid connectors; unclear if this difference was considered significant1 study · 42 participantsUngraded
Flapless implant placement vs Conventional flap elevation
Prosthetic failure · Patients receiving dental implants
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.0 [0.14, 7.10]1 studyUngraded
One suturing technique/material vs A different suturing technique/material
Outcome NR · Patients receiving dental implants
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants (2012) · Cochrane
No trial: which suturing techniques/materials are most effective (objective 4) - no trial identified0 studiesNo studies
Adjunctive local antibiotic (8.5% doxycycline hyclate, Atridox) added to manual debridement vs Manual debridement with chlorhexidine (no antibiotic)
Change in probing pocket depth (PPD) · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 4 months (18 weeks)
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane
MD 0.59 [0.39, 0.79]1 study · 28 participantsUngraded
One soft tissue correction/augmentation technique vs A different soft tissue correction/augmentation technique
Outcome NR · Patients receiving dental implants
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants (2012) · Cochrane
No trial: which soft tissue correction/augmentation technique is most effective (objective 2b) - no trial identified0 studiesNo studies
Crestal incision vs Vestibular incision
Implant failure · Patients receiving dental implants
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants (2012) · Cochrane
RR 3.0 [0.15, 59.89]1 study · 10 participantsUngraded
Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) vs Bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier
Recurrence of peri-implantitis · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 4 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane
RR 2.0 [0.21, 18.98]1 study · 22 participantsUngraded
Implant surface smoothening added to systemic antibiotics + resective surgery + local antibiotics vs No implant surface smoothening (same surgical protocol)
Complications and side effects · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane
No complications occurred in any of the groups.1 study · 17 participantsUngraded
Subepithelial connective tissue graft (palate) at implant placement vs No augmentation
Aesthetics (pink aesthetic score, PES) evaluated by dentist · Partially edentulous patients receiving posterior mandibular implants
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants (2012) · Cochrane
MD -2.87 [-3.67, -2.07]1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Fixed partial denture supported by root-formed implants and remaining teeth (tooth/implant-supported) vs Fixed partial denture supported only by root-formed implants (implant-supported)
Alveolar bone loss · Partially edentulous patients (mandible) receiving FDPs; split-mouth, 10-year · 10 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
No significant differences in alveolar bone loss: 0.6 to 0.7 mm for implant-supported versus 0.5 mm for tooth/implant FDPs (narrative)1 study · 23 participantsUngraded
Tilting-type RDP (minor connector design) vs Functional and sanitary RDP designs
Patient satisfaction · Partially edentulous patients with a distal-extension RDP (minor connector); cross-over
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
The tilting-type RDP significantly outscored the functional and sanitary designs for patient satisfaction; within-patient SDs not given, data narrative only1 study · 25 participantsUngraded
RDP with lingual plate major connector vs RDP with sublingual bar major connector
Abutment tooth mobility (Periotest) at 30 months · Partially edentulous patients treated with a mandibular RDP (major connector) · 30 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
MD -1.99 [-3.36, -0.62]1 study · 36 participantsUngraded
Altered-cast technique RDP vs One-piece cast RDP
Patients with increased abutment tooth mobility · Partially edentulous patients treated with a distal-extension RDP
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.81 [0.91, 3.58]1 study · 57 participantsUngraded
Titanium (Procera) abutment vs Gold-alloy (machined UCLA) abutment
Success / prosthetic complications (4 years) · Patients with single-tooth implant crowns; split-mouth, 4-year · 4 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
100% success, no prosthetic complications, and a similar loss of marginal bone (0.4 mm) in both groups (narrative)1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
RDP with I-bar clasps / mesial rests vs RDP with circumferential clasps / distal rests
Treatment success (5-year) · Partially edentulous patients treated with a removable dental prosthesis (RDP) · 5 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
HR 0.58 [0.25, 1.34]1 study · 134 participantsUngraded
Phosphoric etching (acid) gel vs Mechanical debridement and polishing
Cleaning/treatment time · Adults with dental implants and healthy peri-implant soft tissues at baseline · 5 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
Both interventions took a similar time to administer (no statistically significant difference in cleaning time)1 study · 16 participantsUngraded
Immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth extraction) vs Delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction)
Major complications at the implant site · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 5 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
RR 4.20 [1.01, 17.43]1 study · 46 participantsUngraded
Sonic toothbrushing vs Manual toothbrushing
Patient satisfaction (liked toothbrush) · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 6 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
RR 1.48 [1.03, 2.13]1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone) vs Bio-Oss + resorbable barrier
Bone gain (horizontal - HDD) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 3 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
No statistically significant differences in bone gain between the two procedures for horizontal depth of the defect (HDD) (Chen 2007).1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Mechanical debridement plus topical minocycline vs Mechanical debridement plus chlorhexidine gel
Plaque · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 12 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD 6.00 [-9.07, 21.07]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
Mechanical debridement with titanium curettes vs Mechanical debridement with ultrasonic device
Plaque · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 6 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD 5.00 [-21.21, 31.21]1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Listerine mouthwash vs Placebo mouthwash
Plaque · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 3 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD -0.88 [-0.93, -0.83]1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + autogenous bone
Bone gain (vertical - VDH) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
All treatments resulted in statistically significant bone gain, however no statistically significant differences were found between the three procedures (Chen 2005a). Vertical height of the defect (VDH).1 study · 25 participantsUngraded
Listerine mouthwash vs Placebo mouthwash
Marginal bleeding · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 3 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD -0.20 [-0.25, -0.15]1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Mechanical debridement with titanium curettes vs Mechanical debridement with ultrasonic device
Change in probing pocket depth · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 6 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD -0.40 [-1.14, 0.34]1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + autogenous bone
Bone gain (horizontal - HDD) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
All treatments resulted in statistically significant bone gain, however no statistically significant differences were found between the three procedures (Chen 2005a). Horizontal depth of the defect (HDD).1 study · 25 participantsUngraded
Immediate implants (placed in a fresh extraction socket just after tooth extraction) vs Delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction, in healed bone)
Perimplant marginal bone level changes · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 1 year
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
No statistically significant differences for perimplant marginal bone level changes at 1 year (Lindeboom 2006).1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site vs No augmentation
Prosthesis failure · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
In total two implants were lost in the autogenous bone group, whereas no complications or failures occurred in the non-augmented control group; underpowered, no statistically significant difference (Chen 2005b).1 study · 26 participantsUngraded
Hyaluronic acid gel (brushing) vs Chlorhexidine gel (brushing)
Marginal bleeding · Adults with dental implants and healthy peri-implant soft tissues at baseline · 6 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD 0.20 [-0.28, 0.68]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Amine fluoride/stannous fluoride (AmF/SnF2) mouthwash vs Chlorhexidine mouthwash
Staining index · Adults with dental implants and healthy peri-implant soft tissues at baseline · 3 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD 0.06 [-0.10, 0.22]1 study · 33 participantsUngraded
Hyaluronic acid gel (brushing) vs Chlorhexidine gel (brushing)
Plaque · Adults with dental implants and healthy peri-implant soft tissues at baseline · 6 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD -0.47 [-1.08, 0.14]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Phosphoric etching (acid) gel vs Mechanical debridement and polishing
Side effects (pain) · Adults with dental implants and healthy peri-implant soft tissues at baseline · 5 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
Nine out of 16 patients reported slight (7) to moderate (2) pain at the etching gel side compared to none in the debridement group (P < 0.001)1 study · 16 participantsUngraded
Resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration)
Bone gain (horizontal - HDD) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
All treatments resulted in statistically significant bone gain, however no statistically significant differences were found between the three procedures (Chen 2005a). Horizontal depth of the defect (HDD).1 study · 23 participantsUngraded
Powered toothbrushing vs Manual toothbrushing
Change in probing pocket depth · Adults with dental implants and healthy peri-implant soft tissues at baseline · 6 weeks
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
At 6 weeks there was no significant difference in change of probing pocket depths1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone) vs Bio-Oss + resorbable barrier
Bone gain (vertical - VDH) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 3 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
All treatments resulted in statistically significant bone gain, however no statistically significant differences in bone gain were found between the two procedures for vertical height of the defect (VDH) (Chen 2007).1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + autogenous bone
Major complications at the implant/donor site · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
Four complications occurred: two dehiscences in the resorbable group; one abscess and one dehiscence in the resorbable + autogenous bone group; none in the non-resorbable group. No statistically significant differences…1 study · 25 participantsUngraded
Immediate implants (placed in a fresh extraction socket just after tooth extraction) vs Delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction, in healed bone)
Prosthesis failure · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 1 year
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
RR 4.33 [0.76, 24.56]2 studies · 110 participantsUngraded
Resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration)
Bone gain (vertical - VDH) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
All treatments resulted in statistically significant bone gain, however no statistically significant differences were found between the three procedures (Chen 2005a). Vertical height of the defect (VDH).1 study · 23 participantsUngraded
Resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + autogenous bone
Bone gain (vertical - VDH) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
All treatments resulted in statistically significant bone gain, however no statistically significant differences were found between the three procedures (Chen 2005a). Vertical height of the defect (VDH).1 study · 24 participantsUngraded
Resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + autogenous bone
Bone gain (horizontal - HDD) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
All treatments resulted in statistically significant bone gain, however no statistically significant differences were found between the three procedures (Chen 2005a). Horizontal depth of the defect (HDD).1 study · 24 participantsUngraded
Resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + autogenous bone
Major complications at the implant/donor site · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites) · up to 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
Four complications occurred: two dehiscences in the resorbable group; one abscess and one dehiscence in the resorbable + autogenous bone group; none in the non-resorbable group. No statistically significant differences…1 study · 24 participantsUngraded
Immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth extraction) vs Delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction)
Aesthetics assessed by dentist: interproximal papilla dimension · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
No statistically significant difference for the papilla height assessed by the dentist (Schropp 2003).1 study · 44 participantsUngraded