Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

189 questions · 192 findings · 19 reviews

No studies found 35 · 18.2%GRADE not reported 5 · 2.6%Very low 27 · 14.1%Low 64 · 33.3%Moderate 44 · 22.9%High 17 · 8.9%

Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) vs chemotherapy alone

Overall survival (OS) · People with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) probably leads to lower overall Survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) vs chemotherapy alone

Grades 3 and 4 adverse events · People with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed no clear difference in adverse Events grade 3 to 4 compared with chemotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Treatment discontinuation due to adverse event (safety population) · women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

The intervention probably leads to lower treatment discontinuation due to adverse event (safety population) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Treatment‐related death (safety population) · women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

The intervention may leads to higher treatment‐related death (safety population) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Nausea/vomiting* grade 3 or 4 (safety population) · women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

The intervention may leads to higher nausea/vomiting* grade 3 or 4 (safety population) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Anaemia grade 3 or 4 (safety population) · women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

The intervention may leads to higher anaemia grade 3 or 4 (safety population) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Leukopaenia (safety population) · women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

The intervention probably leads to higher leukopaenia (safety population) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy alone

Brain tumour response rates: complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) combinedNo. of participants: 847(6 RCTs)

Pembrolizumab probably leads to higher response rate (partial and complete response) compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Overall survival ‐ trials of metastatic breast cancer participants unselected for TNBC · women with metastatic breast cancer unselected for triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC)

The intervention showed no clear difference in overall survival ‐ trials of metastatic breast cancer participants… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Leukopenia** grade 3 or 4 (safety population) · women with metastatic breast cancer

The intervention probably leads to higher leukopenia** grade 3 or 4 (safety population) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Progression‐free survival/time to progression (randomised participants) ‐ trials of metastatic breast cancer participants unselected for TNBC · women with metastatic breast cancer unselected for triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC)

The intervention showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival/time to progression (randomised… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review