Quality of life · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
MBL (mL per cycle) · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Days of bleeding · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Control of bleeding (cure or improvement to acceptable level) At 2 years · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
Surgery probably leads to higher control of bleeding (cure or improvement to acceptable level) At 4… compared with oral medication (moderate certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
RR 2.66 [1.94, 3.64]
1 study · 186 participants
Moderate
RR 1.29 [1.06, 1.57]
1 study · 173 participants
Low
RR 1.14 [0.97, 1.34]
1 study · 140 participants
Very low
Overall satisfaction with treatment At 2 years · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
Surgery probably leads to higher overall satisfaction with treatment At 2 years compared with oral medication (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall satisfaction with treatment At 5 years · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
It is very uncertain whether surgery changes overall satisfaction with treatment At 5 years compared with oral medication (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events at 4 months · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
Surgery probably leads to lower adverse events at 4 months compared with oral medication (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain score ( · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
1 finding from 1 review
Time off school or work · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
It is very uncertain whether combined low‐dose OCP changes absence from work or school compared with another combined low‐dose OCP (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain score (measured on VAS; 0–100; lower score is better) · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
1 finding from 1 review
Pain improvement · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Requirement for additional medication · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time off school or work · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain improvement (assessed as improvement from 1 major category to next) · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
Combined OCP may leads to higher pain improvement (assessed as improvement from 1 major category to… compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
Combined OCP probably leads to higher adverse events compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Requirement for additional medication · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
Combined OCP may leads to lower requirement for additional medication compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time off school or work · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
Combined OCP may leads to lower absence from work or school compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain score ( · women with primary dysmenorrhoea
1 finding from 1 review