Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,310 questions · 1,358 findings · 214 reviews

No studies found 230 · 16.9%GRADE not reported 169 · 12.4%Very low 269 · 19.8%Low 277 · 20.4%Moderate 291 · 21.4%High 122 · 9%

Citicoline vs standard methods versus placebo

Disability or dependence in daily activities Patients with moderate or lower degree of disability or dependence (according to < 3 scores in the modified Rankin scale) lower scores indicate better outcome · people with acute ischemic stroke

Citicoline showed no clear difference in disability or dependence in daily activities Patients with moderate… compared with placebo or standard treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Very early treatment vs expectant management

Neurodevelopmental outcomes (moderate/severe cognitive delay at 18 to 24 months) · preterm infants

Very early treatment showed no clear difference in neurodevelopmental outcomes (moderate/severe cognitive delay at 18… compared with expectant management (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Very early treatment vs expectant management

Neurodevelopmental outcomes (moderate/severe motor delay at 18 to 24 months) · preterm infants

Very early treatment showed no clear difference in neurodevelopmental outcomes (moderate/severe motor delay at 18 to 24… compared with expectant management (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Very early treatment vs expectant management

Neurodevelopmental outcomes (moderate/severe language delay at 18 to 24 months) · preterm infants

Very early treatment showed no clear difference in neurodevelopmental outcomes (moderate/severe language delay at 18 to… compared with expectant management (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mepolizumab 100 mg vs placebo

Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophilic phenotype · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Mepolizumab 100 mg leads to lower rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophilic phenotype compared with placebo (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mepolizumab 300 mg vs placebo

Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophilic phenotype · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Mepolizumab 300 mg showed no clear difference in rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophilic phenotype compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mepolizumab 300 mg vs placebo

Time to first moderate or severe exacerbation Eosinophilic phenotype · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Mepolizumab 300 mg probably leads to lower time to first moderate or severe exacerbation Eosinophilic phenotype compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mepolizumab 100 mg vs placebo

Moderate‐to‐severe exacerbations (rate) · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Mepolizumab 100 mg showed no clear difference in rate of moderate or severe exacerbations All participants compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Benralizumab 10 mg vs placebo

Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils ≥ 220/μL · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Benralizumab 10 mg showed no clear difference in rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils ≥ 220/μL compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Benralizumab 10 mg vs placebo

Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils < 220/μL · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Benralizumab 10 mg showed no clear difference in rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils < 220/μL compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Benralizumab 30 mg vs placebo

Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils ≥ 220/μL · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Benralizumab 30 mg showed no clear difference in rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils ≥ 220/μL compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Benralizumab 30 mg vs placebo

Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils < 220/μL · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Benralizumab 30 mg showed no clear difference in rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils < 220/μL compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mepolizumab 100 mg vs placebo

Time to first moderate or severe exacerbation Eosinophilic phenotype · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Mepolizumab 100 mg leads to lower time to first moderate or severe exacerbation Eosinophilic phenotype compared with placebo (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Benralizumab 100 mg vs placebo

Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils ≥ 220/μL · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Benralizumab 100 mg showed no clear difference in rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils ≥ 220/μL compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Benralizumab 100 mg vs placebo

Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils < 220/μL · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Benralizumab 100 mg showed no clear difference in rate of moderate or severe exacerbations Eosinophils < 220/μL compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mepolizumab 100 mg vs placebo

Time to first moderate or severe exacerbation All participants · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Mepolizumab 100 mg showed no clear difference in time to first moderate or severe exacerbation All participants compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical examination with risk-based recall vs Clinical examination with 6-month recall

Dental caries: prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (ICDAS 3-6) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders)

Clinical examination with risk-based recall showed no clear difference in dental caries: prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (ICDAS 3-6) compared with clinical examination with 6-month recall (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical examination with risk-based recall vs Clinical examination with 24-month recall

Dental caries: prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (ICDAS 3-6) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders)

Clinical examination with risk-based recall showed no clear difference in dental caries: prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (ICDAS 3-6) compared with clinical examination with 24-month recall (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review