Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,447 questions · 2,590 findings · 266 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 699 · 27%GRADE not reported 289 · 11.2%Very low 614 · 23.7%Low 605 · 23.4%Moderate 322 · 12.4%High 61 · 2.4%

NobelActive external connection implants vs NobelActive internal connection implants

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

NobelActive external connection implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with nobelActive internal connection implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
MD 0.30 [-0.17, 0.77]
1 study · 97 participants
GRADE not reported

NobelActive external connection implants vs NobelActive internal connection implants

Implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

NobelActive external connection implants showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with nobelActive internal connection implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 to 3 years
RR 1.06 [0.25, 4.51]
1 study · 113 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

ADL outcome · people with stroke

2 findings from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 186 participants
Low
Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 451 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.1.3 Includes musculoskeletal versus does not include musculoskeletal Independence in ADL scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 103 participants
Low

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.1 Includes functional training versus does not include functional training Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 188 participants
Low

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.2 Includes neurophysiological versus does not include neurophysiological Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 506 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

3.2.3 Includes musculoskeletal versus does not include musculoskeletal Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 81 participants
Low

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · preventing pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether reactive fibre surfaces changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with foam surfaces (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.86 [0.47, 1.57]
1 study · 68 participants
Very low

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Time to pressure ulcer development · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Support surface associated patient comfort · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Health‐related quality of life · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Reactive fibre surfaces vs foam surfaces

Cost‐effectiveness · preventing pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme

Time spent walking (minutes per week, activity monitor) · people with NMD

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme

Quality of life (SF‐12 PCS) · people with NMD

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 35 participants
Very low

A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme

Quality of life (SF‐12 MCS) · people with NMD

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 35 participants
Low

A sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme vs no sensor‐based, interactive exercise programme

Adverse events/serious adverse events · people with NMD

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Acupuncture combined with other active therapy vs other active therapy

Participant‐reported pain intensity VAS (0‐10, lower score = less pain) · adults with neuropathic pain

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 104 participants
Very low

Acupuncture combined with other active therapy vs other active therapy

At least 50% reduction in pain · adults with neuropathic pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Acupuncture combined with other active therapy vs other active therapy

Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · adults with neuropathic pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found